Corporate
Integrity
Who Should You Really Trust?
(Continued from previous page)
In
the end they defrauded over 420 people in six states. I hate criminally
run businesses so I helped close them down. But one thing that the
media rarely mentions is that once one uncovers such a wildly criminal
corporate action, it can be very difficult to get it straightened
out.
I went to several attorneys before I found one who would even help
me. We contacted the Long Beach police department (where Suma Properties,
Ltd. was headquartered). They refused to take the case saying that
it would tie up their Bunko (major fraud) Division for two years.
The LAPD and LA City Attorney refused to get involved because it was
also in Orange County and extended outside their jurisdiction.
So
we went to various state and federal agencies that declined to get
involved, finally ending up with the California Attorney Generals
Office. They initially expressed an interest. Then after months
of waiting (and dozens more people defrauded) they declined to take
the case without stating any reason.
Finally
we went to the media. CBS was interested and sent out a crew to
interview me and the people who were renting my home from this criminal
corporation and we told the story. Just before it was to air, the
Attorney Generals office suddenly had a change of heart and
decided to take the case. They told CBS to hold off two weeks while
they got some search warrants and arrest warrants issued. Based
on the information I had compiled, they set up a whole sting operation
to come and raid Sumas offices.
The
day before this big raid was scheduled to take place, the TV reporter
took a crew down to Suma to interview the owners (and of course,
tipped them off)! When the police arrived the next morning all they
found was curtains on the windows on phones on the floors. They
had flown the coup. Some bright investigators found out that they
had moved down the street and set up shop under a new name. After
a few hours of helicopter flights to get revised warrants, they
were in jail. The TV reporter lost her job. Seven of the 420+ people
they defrauded got involved in the case and put them in prison.
Now
lets see what we can learn from this case. Would stiffer penalties
have been of much assistance? I dont think so. To them it
was like Las Vegas, taking a chance figuring they could get out
of it if they got caught.
Also,
what does the public get by putting these people into prison? Really,
most prisons seem to be just Criminal University. They learn how
to be better criminals from the other inmates. Although the public
is generally unaware of this, the psychiatrists in charge
of correction or reform gave up on even trying back in the 1970s.
It has only been in the last few years that an old friend, Rick
Pendery, and the non-profit Criminon organization he has helped
popularize, have been introducing a real correctional technology
into prisons worldwide.
But
what could have saved a lot of people a lot of grief? More responsive
and faster-acting organizations that would act to correct these
types of cases when they came to light could have saved hundreds
of homes. Having quick access to basic data about lawsuits filed
against corporations would have made it possible for me and others
to avoid them entirely. I did make several attempts to find out
if they were legitimate and could not find anything on them. The
record of all the lawsuits filed against them was unavailable to
the general public. The California Department of Corporations did
not have any black marks against them.
Why
cant the public have easy, well-publicized Internet or fax
access to current data about corporations and companies? EBay provides
a good study in this type of transparent transactions, where one
has an easy opportunity to see how others feel about the person
you are about to do business with before you spend any money.
KEITH:
Those are some good suggestions, David. Lets examine the larger
ethics questions about the executives running any company. How do
you evaluate the executives to know whether they are the types you
want working for your investment of time or money? Well lets
have a look.
A good
executive will be ethical himself and insist that those below him
are also. Heres an example. An executive discovers that there
has been a substantial over-payment they would personally benefit
from. The ethical executive will correct the over-payment and reorganize
things so that it doesnt happen again. He wont take
it and hope he doesnt get caught. He will not be going to
Vegas and gambling trying to get something for nothing. He wont
be messing around on his spouse. He wont be using false statements
to cover up a real situation. He wont be using drugs and wont
be addicted to alcohol. He wont be encouraging unethical or
immoral behavior.
However
traditional these things sound, they make a good executive and their
absence means potential trouble. So keep your eyes open and stick
with the bright, ethical executives and make yourself a better job
and investment.
--------------------------------------------------------
Keith
Legg and David Sanders are Certified Master Consultants with 50
years combined experience in over 300 industries and professions.
Based
on the works of L. Ron Hubbard.
Criminon
is a trademark and service mark owned by Able and is used with its
permission.
|